Chapter IV · 1428

The First Roads

A rejected petition, a burned village, a lawsuit at Toul, and the war arriving at the door.

I would rather have remained spinning at my mother’s side, for this is not my proper estate. But I must go, and I must do this, because my Lord wills it.

Joan, as remembered by Jean de Metz, 1456

The voices had given her a destination before they gave her a welcome. In the late spring of 1428 she went to her kinsman Durand Laxart, who lived at Burey-le-Petit, and told him she must go to Vaucouleurs to see Robert de Baudricourt, the captain. Laxart is called uncle in the depositions; he was the husband of her cousin. He took her. It is the first recorded act of the mission in the world of men.

Baudricourt was a practical soldier holding an island of Valois loyalty in a Burgundian sea. A sixteen-year-old who said the King of Heaven had sent her to save France was not a military asset he could enter in a ledger. The story that he told Laxart to box her ears and take her back to her father is in the later testimony; it is the right kind of story even if the slap is too neat. He refused her. She went home.

Home was not waiting. In the same season the war came down on the Meuse villages. The people of Domrémy drove their cattle to Neufchâteau and took shelter. Joan’s family lodged at the inn of a woman called La Rousse. The stay lasted a fortnight or so. The rehabilitation asked about the inn with a particular anxiety: had the girl lived among soldiers and loose women? Witnesses said she kept to the house, went to confession, and stayed close to her parents. The English later wanted a tavern Joan. The village gave them a refugee.

The man who said she had promised him

There was also a lawsuit. A young man of the country claimed she had promised him marriage. She denied it and went before the officiality at Toul, the ecclesiastical court of the diocese. She won. The episode is easy to skip in a life of battles; it should not be skipped. It shows her already in conflict with the ordinary fate of a labourer’s daughter — marriage, a hearth, her father’s peace — and already willing to walk to a town and speak in a court rather than be bound. She said her voices had told her she must not marry. The Toul case is the vow meeting the village.

Dates here are not clean. Some reconstructions put the first Vaucouleurs visit in May 1428, around Ascension; some put the Toul case after the flight to Neufchâteau; some put a stay with Laxart in 1425 that may be a memory mixed with later journeys. The sequence that best fits the witnesses is: first refusal at Vaucouleurs; raid and flight; return to a damaged village; the marriage claim; then, as Orléans began to starve, the second and third assaults on Baudricourt’s patience.

Orléans as a clock

In October 1428 the English sat down before Orléans. Joan did not yet know the captains’ names she would later throw at Talbot in a letter, but her voices had already named the city. The siege is the clock of this volume. From the moment Salisbury’s guns opened, her private instruction had a public deadline. A mission to raise a siege is a mission that can fail in a calendar. That is partly why men eventually listened. Prophets who promise the end of the world can be postponed. A girl who names a city presently surrounded can be tested by the event.

She went again to Laxart. She went again to Vaucouleurs. The second refusal was less complete than the first, because this time she did not go home to disappear. She stayed in the town, at the house of Henri and Catherine Le Royer. Catherine later testified to her spinning, her prayer, her going to the church of Saint-Nicolas. The town began to look at her. That is how a mission leaves a garden and enters politics: not by a miracle in the sky, but by a girl who will not go away, in a fortress that has no help to send its king.

Baudricourt had her examined, in some accounts, by a priest, to see if there was evil in her. There is a memory of an exorcism, or of a blessing, at the church — a priest commanding any devil to leave. She submitted to it. The devil did not make a scene. The captain was not convinced, but he had begun to run out of the easy answers. Meanwhile the Duke of Lorraine, old and ill at Nancy, heard of her and sent for her, thinking perhaps she could cure him. She went, told him to put aside his mistress and be good to his wife, and asked for his help to go into France. It is a remarkable piece of nerve: a peasant correcting a duke in his own hall. He gave her four francs and a horse. He did not give her an escort to Chinon.

By January 1429 she was back at Vaucouleurs. Orléans had been under siege for three months. The court of Charles had not relieved it. Two soldiers in Baudricourt’s garrison — Jean de Novelonpont, called Jean de Metz, and Bertrand de Poulengy — had begun to listen to her as men listen to someone who has already cost them their skepticism. De Metz later recalled asking her whether she meant to go in her own clothes. She said she would take a man’s dress. The town provided one. The hair was cut. The second life begins there, in borrowed wool, in a captain’s town that still had not said yes.

Sources in this chapter

  1. 1. Nullification trial, 1455–56

    Durand Laxart, 1456 (Duparc, I); Pernoud, Retrial

    Laxart testified that Joan told him her Lord had commanded her to go to the king, and that he took her to Vaucouleurs. He is the bridge between the household and the garrison.

  2. 2. Nullification trial, 1455–56

    Jean de Metz; Bertrand de Poulengy; Laxart, 1456

    Baudricourt’s first dismissal is firm in the tradition. The boxed ears may be folklore sitting on a real refusal. He was Charles’s man; his caution was professional, not Burgundian.

  3. 3. Nullification trial, 1455–56

    Domrémy witnesses on the flight to Neufchâteau and La Rousse’s inn

    The stay at the inn was probed because Rouen had implied unchastity. Witnesses insist on her conduct. The village was burned or emptied in a raid; exact damage varies by deposition.

  4. 4. Condemnation trial, 1431

    Trial, on the marriage promise; nullification corroboration

    Joan acknowledged a suit before the official of Toul and said she had made no promise. She had gone herself to defend it. The man’s name is not securely known. The case is one of the few glimpses of her acting in a court before Rouen.

  5. 5. Modern scholarship

    Pernoud & Clin, Her Story, chronology; Castor, A History

    The 1428 itinerary is the least secure in the volume. I follow the majority reconstruction (May 1428 first Vaucouleurs visit; summer/autumn raid; Toul; return) while marking the seams. Nothing in the military narrative of 1429 depends on the month of the slap.

  6. 6. Chronicle

    Journal du siège d’Orléans, October 1428 ff.

    The siege’s calendar is independent of Joan and is the control on her prophecy. She named Orléans before she had seen it. That is why Poitiers could propose the event as the sign.

  7. 7. Nullification trial, 1455–56

    Catherine Le Royer, Vaucouleurs, 1456

    The Le Royer house is the first urban household that took her in as a mission rather than as a niece. Catherine’s deposition is among the more vivid of the nullification.

  8. 8. Nullification trial, 1455–56

    Jean de Metz; Henri Le Royer; tradition in the Chronique de la Pucelle

    Charles II of Lorraine, at Nancy. Joan’s rebuke about the mistress is in the testimony. The horse and the four francs are practical; they are not an endorsement of the voices. Saint-Nicolas-du-Port is named as a shrine on the return.

  9. 9. Nullification trial, 1455–56

    Jean de Metz; Poulengy; Le Royer

    The male dress was given at Vaucouleurs for the road. Joan kept it afterwards among the soldiers as a protection of her vow and her body. Rouen made the dress the heresy. Volume I records the reason she gave: the voices had told her to take it, and it was the clothing of her work.